🔗 Share this article

"Half of my personal history is stored on this app, and unexpectedly they demand us to cover the cost for it."

Negative reviews and a sense of injustice have dominated social media conversations since the app emerged as the latest digital platform to start charging for a service that users previously enjoyed using for at no cost.

The company behind Snapchat revealed in the fall that it would begin imposing fees people if they have more than five gigabytes worth of archived pictures and videos stored as Snapchat Memories.

In the eyes of countless individuals, these past uploads function as a portal to bygone days – driving some to criticize the company of "corporate greed" in messages on online platforms and negative ratings on Google and Apple's app stores.

Available Solutions

The company has compared its premium storage tiers to those provided by Apple and Google for smartphones.

As another possibility for users unwilling to subscribe, subscribers have the ability to export their saved content – which for many people cover large volumes – to their own hardware.

The company stated that only a minority of users would be affected by the updated terms.

The company admitted that it was "never easy to shift from using a feature without cost to paying for it" – but implied it would be "justified by the benefits" for users.

Numerous opposing the move on the internet clearly oppose this view.

Widespread Discontent

A web-based protest called the fee a "reminiscence fee", with users calling it "Orwellian" and "absurd" – while one person vowed to abandon the application in the future.

Meanwhile, in a poor review on the Google Play store, a person calling themselves Natacha Jonsson said it felt "morally questionable".

"As a member of that generation, many people have a long history of recorded experiences on the platform," they wrote. "The vast majority only remained on the platform mainly for that reason. Five gigabytes is insufficient when you have extensive collections of recordings... Farewell Snapchat."

And, a London-based user, a university student journalism student in the UK capital, posted on the video platform her intention to remove the application.

"I concluded that I had to save all my memories as soon as I could," she explained. "Nearly every part of my adolescence have been documented through my Snapchat memories, all of the photos in there are really important to me."

"This seems illogical to introduce fees users for a service that has been complimentary for such a long time."

Unknown Fees

The company has not yet said how much premium options would cost in the United Kingdom – only that they are part of a "gradual global rollout".

Yet a young adult Amber Daley, who is based in London, stated in a video on the social platform that she would be "upset" by these fees.

She mentioned that the service had become "a regular habit" since she first joined in 2014.

Although she acknowledged she understood the app needed to earn income, Amber indicated that the Memories feature means more to users than the firm may have understood.

"Personally, I believe it's quite an unfair step to charge your customers who have been consistent and engaged," she said. "These aren't just called Memories, these are our real-life recollections."

Professional Insight

Firms opting to impose fees from users for a service that was previously free is a frequent occurrence, and millions pay for options like iCloud and Google Drive to backup their images and clips from their smartphone.

The reality of storing data in the digital storage – which certain experts in the tech industry like to refer to as simply "an external server" – is that it involves expenses.

"Managing enormous quantities of saved content on Snapchat requires significant resources," social media consultant a tech commentator stated. "The platform has to attempt to identify a way to cover the cost of storage, data transfer, copies, media distribution, data protection – all that stuff."

However Mr Navarra noted that requiring payment for a feature that had once been complimentary, and subscribers had been encouraged to use as such, may appear as a "deceptive practice" for some.

"Changing the rules after individuals have accumulated this extensive stored content feels inappropriate," he noted. And for many, he added, "Saved content is more than stored files, they're emotional artefacts."

The opinion was reflected by those posting critical reviews, with an individual calling their saved images and clips "the most precious thing to me".

"These archives contain all elements of my life within them from celebrations of new family members' births, sad moments of loss, times spent with loved ones, [and] my entire youth," they commented.

Academic Insight

An academic expert, a university scholar at an educational establishment in the Netherlands, said that Snapchat's move demonstrates the implications of for-profit services being used to archive emotional private media.

"They benefit from this reliance, mutual reliance, and presumption of never-ending access, which even motivates certain individuals to remain with the platform or keep accessing it in order to review their stored media," she explained to the BBC. "However these are not altruistic protectors of individual recollection."